<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Portland Oregon Personal Injury and Class Action Attorney – Lawyer – Paul and Sugerman PC &#187; Chamber of Commerce</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pspc.com/category/chamber-of-commerce/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pspc.com</link>
	<description>David vs. Goliath view from Oregon trial lawyers at Paul &#38; Sugerman, PC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 03:16:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Oregon bleach-blonde luxury-litigator claim rejected</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2009/05/oregon-bleach-blonde-bad-hair-lawsuit-rejected</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2009/05/oregon-bleach-blonde-bad-hair-lawsuit-rejected#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 16:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chamber of Commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon injury attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Oregonian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil justice system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frivolous lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/?p=320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s one of those cases that causes those of us who represent consumers to shake our heads. An affluent woman who has been bleaching her hair since childhood sues an upscale salon for botched hair treatment. She seeks $50,000 in humiliation damages, plus substantial out-of-pocket expenses for hair treatment and childcare.
Deliberating for just an hour, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2009/05/oregon-bleach-blonde-bad-hair-lawsuit-rejected/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chamber of Commerce trying to hold on to the trough</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2008/11/chamber-of-commerce-trying-to-hold-on-to-the-trough</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2008/11/chamber-of-commerce-trying-to-hold-on-to-the-trough#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bush administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chamber of Commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon consumer lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frivolous lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immunity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal preemption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trial lawyers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/?p=251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back on the kleptocracy, and it looks like the Chamber of Commerce is working to keep its position at the trough by threatening to go to war with the incoming Obama administration. It seems that the Chamber is concerned about how new or revised regulations that reverse the Bush-era&#8217;s kleptocracy may affect the Chamber. The [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2008/11/chamber-of-commerce-trying-to-hold-on-to-the-trough/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bribery scheme adding to high food prices?</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2008/08/bribery-scheme-adding-to-high-food-prices</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2008/08/bribery-scheme-adding-to-high-food-prices#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 15:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chamber of Commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon consumer lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frivolous lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bribery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food prices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/?p=217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I do most of the grocery shopping for the family, so like everyone else, I&#8217;ve been wide-eyed at the steep increase in food prices.  I&#8217;ve heard a lot about rising fuel prices, credit crunches, and inflation as part of the talking heads&#8217; various explanations for the whys of it all.
I almost missed this piece on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2008/08/bribery-scheme-adding-to-high-food-prices/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
