<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Portland Oregon Personal Injury and Class Action Attorney – Lawyer – Paul and Sugerman PC &#187; class action</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pspc.com/category/class-action/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pspc.com</link>
	<description>David vs. Goliath view from Oregon trial lawyers at Paul &#38; Sugerman, PC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 03:16:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Comcast Oregon late fee class action update-cable customers win another round</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2009/12/comcast-oregon-late-fee-class-action-update-cable-customers-win-another-round</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2009/12/comcast-oregon-late-fee-class-action-update-cable-customers-win-another-round#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 00:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/?p=367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, Judge Richard Baldwin ruled that Comcast Oregon&#8217;s cable TV subscribers may seek statutory damages in their pending class action. Here is a pdf copy of the trial court&#8217;s opinion: Judge Baldwin Order &#38; Opinion re amended class cert order.  The upshot is that subscribers included in the late fee class action can seek $200, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2009/12/comcast-oregon-late-fee-class-action-update-cable-customers-win-another-round/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Follow up Western Culinary Institute consumer fraud class action</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2009/12/follow-up-western-culinary-institute-consumer-fraud-class-action</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2009/12/follow-up-western-culinary-institute-consumer-fraud-class-action#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 13:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Career Education Corp.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[western culinary institute]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/?p=364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a nice summary of the case from a KGW8 news report. The story aired yesterday on Channel 8. The link is to their web version. Kudos to Anne Yaeger at KGW who did a heck of a job putting together a substantive story so quickly. Interestingly, the students interviewed are eager about their prospects. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2009/12/follow-up-western-culinary-institute-consumer-fraud-class-action/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update: Western Culinary Institute class action certified-opinion</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2009/12/update-western-culinary-institute-class-action-certified-opinion</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2009/12/update-western-culinary-institute-class-action-certified-opinion#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 18:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Career Education Corp.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[western culinary institute]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/?p=360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, Judge Baldwin issued his decision allowing the consumer fraud case against Western Culinary Institute to go forward as a class action. It&#8217;s a long opinion that focuses on the details of class action rules, but it also provides information on what the students claim in the case. I&#8217;ve uploaded a pdf scan of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2009/12/update-western-culinary-institute-class-action-certified-opinion/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New on Oregon Class Action Blog: The curious tale of the tort reformer who filed his own class action</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2009/08/new-on-oregon-class-action-blog-the-curious-tale-of-the-tort-reformer-who-filed-his-own-class-action</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2009/08/new-on-oregon-class-action-blog-the-curious-tale-of-the-tort-reformer-who-filed-his-own-class-action#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Camber of Commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon class action attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil justice system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frivolous lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tort reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/?p=326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wonders never cease. Here&#8217;s a blog post at the Oregon Class Action blog about the California tort reform advocate who filed a class action against the City of Sacramento for towing his illegally parked car. Can&#8217;t hardly wait to see how this one comes out!
David Sugerman
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2009/08/new-on-oregon-class-action-blog-the-curious-tale-of-the-tort-reformer-who-filed-his-own-class-action/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New article from Rust Consulting on class action claim rates</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2009/05/new-article-from-rust-consulting-on-class-action-claim-rates</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2009/05/new-article-from-rust-consulting-on-class-action-claim-rates#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 16:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oregon class action attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/?p=322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just came across this informative article from Rust Consulting on claim rates in class action settlements.
It&#8217;s a bit geeky or at least specialized, but the issue is important for lawyers who handle class actions and judges who oversee them. And actually, it&#8217;s important to consumers and businesses, too.
The question is: When a class action settles, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2009/05/new-article-from-rust-consulting-on-class-action-claim-rates/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consumer class action guidelines published</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2009/04/consumer-class-action-guidelines-published</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2009/04/consumer-class-action-guidelines-published#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oregon class action attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/?p=309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kudos to Public Citizen and Brian Wolfman for this update and all the hard work on an important consumer class action issue. Brian was a stalwart in getting published the National Association of Consumer Advocates &#8220;Standards and Guidelines for LItigating and Settling Consumer Class Actions.&#8221;
The updated guidelines appear at 255 FRD 215 (2009). As with [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2009/04/consumer-class-action-guidelines-published/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AIG and friends push bad idea in California</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2009/03/aig-and-friends-push-bad-idea-in-california</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2009/03/aig-and-friends-push-bad-idea-in-california#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oregon class action attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subprime mortgage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tort reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/?p=297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a disconcerting story about anti-consumer legislation pending in California. The bill would limit consumer class actions by allowing unhappy defendants to appeal pro-consumer rulings. There are multiple levels of irony in California&#8217;s AB298.
It&#8217;s being pushed by the &#8220;Civil Justice Association.&#8221;  Turns out that the Civil justice Association is controlled by AIG, bailed out banks [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2009/03/aig-and-friends-push-bad-idea-in-california/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oregon Comcast late fee class action certified</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2009/03/oregon-comcast-late-fee-class-action-certified</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2009/03/oregon-comcast-late-fee-class-action-certified#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 22:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon class action attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/?p=295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No one said it would be quick or easy, and no one was right on both counts.
We&#8217;ve finally gotten an order entered certifying a class action in Martin v. Comcast. It&#8217;s an Oregon class action in which the class claims that Comcast illegally charged TV cable service late fees in Oregon.
Here is the link to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2009/03/oregon-comcast-late-fee-class-action-certified/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Providence medical record theft oral argument</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2009/03/providence-medical-record-theft-oral-argument</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2009/03/providence-medical-record-theft-oral-argument#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oregon Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon class action attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Providence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law geek alert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer medical records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data theft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/?p=294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those following Gibson v. Providence, State of Oregon Court of Appeals, Case No. CA A137930, we&#8217;re scheduled to argue in front of the Court of Appeals next Thursday, April 2. The question is whether the trial court erroneously dismissed the proposed class action.
It&#8217;s been a long haul, and there is far to go. No [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2009/03/providence-medical-record-theft-oral-argument/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comcast rate hike and Oregon class action update</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2009/02/comcast-rate-hike-and-oregon-class-action-update</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2009/02/comcast-rate-hike-and-oregon-class-action-update#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon class action attorney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/?p=288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today&#8217;s news brings this report on Comcast Oregon&#8217;s rate hike.  Kind of interesting that Comcast is raising cable rates amidst the economic meltdown that is now slamming Oregon.
At the same time, Comcast is facing a class action in Oregon over claims that it has illegally billed late fees to Oregon Comcast cable subscribers. Full disclosure: [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2009/02/comcast-rate-hike-and-oregon-class-action-update/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
