<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Portland Oregon Personal Injury and Class Action Attorney – Lawyer – Paul and Sugerman PC &#187; corporate responsibility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pspc.com/category/corporate-responsibility/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pspc.com</link>
	<description>David vs. Goliath view from Oregon trial lawyers at Paul &#38; Sugerman, PC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 03:16:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>AIG and friends push bad idea in California</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2009/03/aig-and-friends-push-bad-idea-in-california</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2009/03/aig-and-friends-push-bad-idea-in-california#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oregon class action attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subprime mortgage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tort reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/?p=297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a disconcerting story about anti-consumer legislation pending in California. The bill would limit consumer class actions by allowing unhappy defendants to appeal pro-consumer rulings. There are multiple levels of irony in California&#8217;s AB298.
It&#8217;s being pushed by the &#8220;Civil Justice Association.&#8221;  Turns out that the Civil justice Association is controlled by AIG, bailed out banks [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2009/03/aig-and-friends-push-bad-idea-in-california/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nice Job</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2008/12/nice-job</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2008/12/nice-job#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 17:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil justice system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contingent fee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul & Sugerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/?p=266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Only occasionally do I really enjoy a meeting room full of lawyers. Last night was one of those occasions. My partner of 14 years was honored with the likes of Hardy Myers, Greg MacPherson and colleagues from across our state. The reason: The Oregon State Bar&#8217;s Annual President&#8217;s Award, given for meritorious service to the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2008/12/nice-job/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chamber of Commerce trying to hold on to the trough</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2008/11/chamber-of-commerce-trying-to-hold-on-to-the-trough</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2008/11/chamber-of-commerce-trying-to-hold-on-to-the-trough#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bush administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chamber of Commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon consumer lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frivolous lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immunity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal preemption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trial lawyers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/?p=251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back on the kleptocracy, and it looks like the Chamber of Commerce is working to keep its position at the trough by threatening to go to war with the incoming Obama administration. It seems that the Chamber is concerned about how new or revised regulations that reverse the Bush-era&#8217;s kleptocracy may affect the Chamber. The [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2008/11/chamber-of-commerce-trying-to-hold-on-to-the-trough/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Product safety: If you liked toys from China, you&#8217;ll love&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2008/11/product-safety-if-you-liked-toys-from-china-youll-love</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2008/11/product-safety-if-you-liked-toys-from-china-youll-love#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 20:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon injury lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/?p=247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I try like heck to avoid the media&#8217;s scare-of-the-day mentality. But this New York Times mag report leaves me with one of those bad feelings in the gut.  Drugs manufactured in China? Great. After the various lead paint toy problems, I&#8217;ll pass.
Part of the problem is the Wal-Mart syndrome that says that lower prices are [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2008/11/product-safety-if-you-liked-toys-from-china-youll-love/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More action to prevent future lending problems</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2008/10/more-action-to-prevent-future-lending-problems</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2008/10/more-action-to-prevent-future-lending-problems#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bush administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon class action lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon consumer lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seattle Post-Intelligencer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignee liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bail out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[predatory lending]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/?p=242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At first glance, this prediction bodes well for consumers. As reported here in the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, Congress will move to add Wall Street financiers to the list of those who will be held accountable for funding predatory mortgages.
The technical term is assignee liability. It&#8217;s important to understand the underlying concept because it plays a big [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2008/10/more-action-to-prevent-future-lending-problems/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bailouts-we better be getting our share</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2008/09/bailouts-we-better-be-getting-our-share</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2008/09/bailouts-we-better-be-getting-our-share#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 17:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bear Stearns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon consumer lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bail out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/?p=232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Justice Rehnquist&#8211;not one of my favorites of the Supremes&#8211;once observed in an important U.S. Supreme Court opinion that you, &#8220;have to take the bitter with the sweet.&#8221; I&#8217;m reminded of those words as we&#8217;re treated to the sight of former free-marketeers engineering profoundly expensive bailouts.  We&#8217;re told that taxpayers have to foot the bill to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2008/09/bailouts-we-better-be-getting-our-share/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Corporate PR strategy: Take responsibility or blame the lawyers?</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2008/08/corporate-pr-strategy-take-responsibility-or-blame-the-lawyers</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2008/08/corporate-pr-strategy-take-responsibility-or-blame-the-lawyers#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 21:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Center for Science in the Public Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon class action lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Airborne settlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate responsiblity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/?p=218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For years, Airborne Health touted Airborne as a cold prevention remedy. This Washington Post article reports on the Federal Trade Commission&#8217;s settlement of false advertising claims against the manufacturer. According to the story, the company agreed to refunds of up to $30 million dollars settlement to dispose of the false advertising claims.
Bad enough that Airborne [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2008/08/corporate-pr-strategy-take-responsibility-or-blame-the-lawyers/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
