<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Portland Oregon Personal Injury and Class Action Attorney – Lawyer – Paul and Sugerman PC &#187; employment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pspc.com/category/employment/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pspc.com</link>
	<description>David vs. Goliath view from Oregon trial lawyers at Paul &#38; Sugerman, PC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 03:16:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Jury Awards $19 Million to Oregon Car Salesmen</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2008/08/jury-awards-19-million-to-oregon-car-salesmen</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2008/08/jury-awards-19-million-to-oregon-car-salesmen#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oregon Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oregon employment lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[race discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dozier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomason verdict]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/?p=219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s just coming out, but The Oregonian is reporting that Oregon lawyers Keith Dozier and Aaron Baker obtained a jury verdict for $19 million in federal court here in Portland on behalf of four Thomason Toyota employees who suffered racial discrimination on the job. Keith is one of my favorite younger lawyers in Portland. He&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2008/08/jury-awards-19-million-to-oregon-car-salesmen/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oregon Supreme Court rules no wages for employees&#8217; missed rest breaks</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2008/05/oregon-supreme-court-rules-no-wages-for-employees-missed-rest-breaks</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2008/05/oregon-supreme-court-rules-no-wages-for-employees-missed-rest-breaks#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon class action lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wage and hour]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/?p=156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those of us who handle wage and hour cases learned yesterday that the Oregon Supreme Court issued a major decision denying employees the right to collect wages. In the case, Gafur v. Legacy Good Sam Hospital, workers who did not get mandatory rest breaks sued to collect unpaid wages.
Oregon law provides that employees get 10 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2008/05/oregon-supreme-court-rules-no-wages-for-employees-missed-rest-breaks/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Catching Up: Senate Kills Equal Pay Act Amendment</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2008/04/catching-up-senate-kills-equal-pay-act-amendment</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2008/04/catching-up-senate-kills-equal-pay-act-amendment#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oregon class action lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work place]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equal pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/?p=141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So this is last week&#8217;s news, but it&#8217;s important. As was widely reported, the Senate killed amendments to the Equal Pay Act. I&#8217;m only getting to it now because I was away last week.
Here&#8217;s some background on the Lebetter case, the horrible U.S. Supreme Court ruling that made this an issue. The gist is that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2008/04/catching-up-senate-kills-equal-pay-act-amendment/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Bad on Arbitration&#8211;Employers Get Better Outcome</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2008/04/more-bad-on-arbitration-employers-get-better-outcome</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2008/04/more-bad-on-arbitration-employers-get-better-outcome#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 01:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oregon class action lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon injury lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arbitration clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mandatory arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employees]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/?p=139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Somehow I&#8217;m not surprised. But this report summarizes a new study indicating that employers fare better than employees when an arbitration result is challenged in court. The author describes the employees&#8217; chances in arbitration reviews as &#8220;snowballing futility.&#8221; Nice phrase; horrible condition.
Congress is set to revisit the mandatory arbitration system abuses.  Those who benefit [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2008/04/more-bad-on-arbitration-employers-get-better-outcome/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Horrifying Mandatory Arbitration Case</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2008/03/admin-claim</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2008/03/admin-claim#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 23:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[arbitration clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mandatory arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex abuse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/2008/03/admin-claim</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As noted in a marvelous on-line LA Times piece, mandatory arbitration clause abuse has reached a new high. Or is that low?
Peggy Garrity writes about the terrible case of the woman who claimed to have been drugged and raped by her co-workers while employed in Iraq by KBR, the contractor and former Halliburton subsidiary. Read [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2008/03/admin-claim/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fred Meyer Faces Sexual Harrassment Lawsuit</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2008/02/fred-meyer-faces-sexual-harrassment-lawsuit</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2008/02/fred-meyer-faces-sexual-harrassment-lawsuit#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fred Meyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon sex abuse lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oregon employment lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex harrassment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual harassment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/2008/02/fred-meyer-faces-sexual-harrassment-lawsuit</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission  (EEOC) filed suit in federal court in Portland on behalf of several female employees who claim to have been sexually harassed at Fred Meyer&#8217;s Oregon City store. Here is the url to the news report: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23358954
According to news reports, the EEOC claims that Fred Meyer managers sexually [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2008/02/fred-meyer-faces-sexual-harrassment-lawsuit/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
