<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Portland Oregon Personal Injury and Class Action Attorney – Lawyer – Paul and Sugerman PC &#187; food</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pspc.com/category/food/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pspc.com</link>
	<description>David vs. Goliath view from Oregon trial lawyers at Paul &#38; Sugerman, PC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 03:16:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Oregon chain restaurant disclosure bill moves forward</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2009/04/oregon-chain-restaurant-disclosure-bill-moves-forward</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2009/04/oregon-chain-restaurant-disclosure-bill-moves-forward#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 23:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oregon Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon class action attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portland injury attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/?p=316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Oregonlive, here&#8217;s an update on HB 2726, the bill that would require chain restaurants to disclose calorie and nutrition information to consumers. The bill reportedly passed out of committee. Here&#8217;s the interesting thing. It passed out of committee on straight party lines. All the D&#8217;s voted in favor, and all R&#8217;s voted against.
Next stop, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2009/04/oregon-chain-restaurant-disclosure-bill-moves-forward/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Calorie count bill pending in Oregon Legislature</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2009/04/calorie-count-bill-pending-in-oregon-legislature</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2009/04/calorie-count-bill-pending-in-oregon-legislature#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 15:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon class action attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/?p=307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new proposed law pending in the Oregon Legislature, HB 2726, would require chain restaurants to provide Oregon consumers with calorie and nutrition information on items on the menu. Onward Oregon is pushing the bill. As I&#8217;ve noted before, giving consumers calorie and nutrition information is a great idea.
Those who are critical of obesity fast-food [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2009/04/calorie-count-bill-pending-in-oregon-legislature/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obesity seller front group counsels beware of Thanksgiving lawsuits</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2008/11/obesity-seller-front-group-counsels-beware-of-thanksgiving-lawsuits</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2008/11/obesity-seller-front-group-counsels-beware-of-thanksgiving-lawsuits#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 17:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Center for Science in the Public Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon consumer lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portland injury lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frivolous lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Center for Consumer Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food labeling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/?p=260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[George Orwell would have marvelled at the name, &#8220;The Center for Consumer Freedom.&#8221; Is that a great name or what? So why are they opposed to food labeling requirements? Why do they claim that the obesity epidemic is a contrivance? And why do they counsel consumers to get written waivers from guests before serving unlabeled [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2008/11/obesity-seller-front-group-counsels-beware-of-thanksgiving-lawsuits/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Food labeling rules give consumers more control</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2008/11/food-labeling-rules-give-consumers-more-control</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2008/11/food-labeling-rules-give-consumers-more-control#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 17:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oregon injury lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portland personal injury lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food labeling rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[informed choices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/?p=254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s the US Department of Agriculture&#8217;s brochure on new rules requiring labeling of the country of orgiin of meats, fish and produce.  At the same time, the State of California is requiring larger restaurant chains to provide calorie and nutrition information to consumers. Both sets of rules provide important information to consumers, though each works [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2008/11/food-labeling-rules-give-consumers-more-control/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oregon Restaurant Association loses a round at Multnomah County</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2008/08/oregon-restaurant-association-loses-a-round-at-multnomah-county</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2008/08/oregon-restaurant-association-loses-a-round-at-multnomah-county#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 16:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Multnomah County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregonian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Willamette Week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutrition information rules]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/?p=204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hadn&#8217;t been following the nutrition information restaurant posting issue too closely. It seems that a divided county commission took the first step to require chain restaurants to post nutrition information yesterday. I was a bit surprised that Lisa Naito voted against, and Maria Rojo de Steffy initially opposed the measure.
Naito&#8217;s  opposition surprised me because [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2008/08/oregon-restaurant-association-loses-a-round-at-multnomah-county/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
