<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Portland Oregon Personal Injury and Class Action Attorney – Lawyer – Paul and Sugerman PC &#187; jurisdiction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pspc.com/category/jurisdiction/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pspc.com</link>
	<description>David vs. Goliath view from Oregon trial lawyers at Paul &#38; Sugerman, PC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 03:16:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Update Oregon National Guard case against KBR</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2009/09/update-oregon-national-guard-case-against-kbr</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2009/09/update-oregon-national-guard-case-against-kbr#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 22:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon National Guard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon injury attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic injury]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/?p=340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s the update on Oregon National Guard soldiers case against KBR. By way of background, members of the Oregon National Guard who served in Iraq in 2003 were exposed to sodium dichromate while protecting KBR employees at the Qarmat Ali water treatment plant. We filed the case this summer.
It has grown. We filed an amended [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2009/09/update-oregon-national-guard-case-against-kbr/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ninth Circuit says no jurisdiction over eBay seller in buyer&#8217;s home state</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2008/09/ninth-circuit-says-no-jurisdiction-over-ebay-seller-in-buyers-home-state</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2008/09/ninth-circuit-says-no-jurisdiction-over-ebay-seller-in-buyers-home-state#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 15:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ninth Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon consumer lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eBay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law geek alert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/?p=222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ll try not to be too geeky here, but the Ninth Circuit issued an opinion recently in Boschetto v. Hansen , Case No. 06-16595 (Aug. 20, 2008) that tells us something about how our pre-www legal system handles rights and liabilities in this era of internet commerce.
The question: What happens in an Ebay auction goes [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2008/09/ninth-circuit-says-no-jurisdiction-over-ebay-seller-in-buyers-home-state/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
