<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Portland Oregon Personal Injury and Class Action Attorney – Lawyer – Paul and Sugerman PC &#187; Jurors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pspc.com/category/jurors/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pspc.com</link>
	<description>David vs. Goliath view from Oregon trial lawyers at Paul &#38; Sugerman, PC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 03:16:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Oregon bleach-blonde luxury-litigator claim rejected</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2009/05/oregon-bleach-blonde-bad-hair-lawsuit-rejected</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2009/05/oregon-bleach-blonde-bad-hair-lawsuit-rejected#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 16:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chamber of Commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon injury attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Oregonian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil justice system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frivolous lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/?p=320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s one of those cases that causes those of us who represent consumers to shake our heads. An affluent woman who has been bleaching her hair since childhood sues an upscale salon for botched hair treatment. She seeks $50,000 in humiliation damages, plus substantial out-of-pocket expenses for hair treatment and childcare.
Deliberating for just an hour, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2009/05/oregon-bleach-blonde-bad-hair-lawsuit-rejected/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter in the jury room</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2009/04/305</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2009/04/305#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 20:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jury duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon injury attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portland injury attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil justice system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/?p=305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This report from an Arkansas trial closes the book on a recent clash between new media and jury trials.  The trial judge ruled that a twitter users tweets were in bad taste but did not amount to misconduct. He declined to grant a new trial to Stoam Holdings, a building materials company.
Twitter, Facebook and Google [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2009/04/305/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In trial and on the net: how trial lawyers use the web</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2008/08/in-trial-and-on-the-net-how-trial-lawyers-use-the-web</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2008/08/in-trial-and-on-the-net-how-trial-lawyers-use-the-web#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 18:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portland injury lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jury selection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trial]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/?p=215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good article here on a growing practice. Trial lawyers use the internet to find out background on potential witnesses, potential parties, and even potential jurors.  This includes social networking sites to find out what the real story is on someone involved in a case.  The article raises questions about whether it&#8217;s ethical to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2008/08/in-trial-and-on-the-net-how-trial-lawyers-use-the-web/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jury duty in Multnomah County</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2008/08/jury-duty-in-multnomah-county</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2008/08/jury-duty-in-multnomah-county#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 15:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Jurors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jury duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon injury lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portland personal injury lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multnomah County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oregon trial lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/?p=208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The title is unfortunate, but this Oregonian piece gives a good feel for the critical importance of jury duty. I especially appreciate the extensive discussion of Judges Bearden, Walker, Wilson and LaBarre&#8217;s methods of promoting the importance of jury service.
I served on one jury in a criminal matter some years ago. It was an experience [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2008/08/jury-duty-in-multnomah-county/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Berkman/Arthur Andersen juror weighs in</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2008/07/another-berkmanarthur-andersen-juror-weighs-in</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2008/07/another-berkmanarthur-andersen-juror-weighs-in#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Jurors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon class action lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil justice system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Berkman trial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[juror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/?p=201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great news. Another juror  from the recent Craig Berkman trial contacted me following the most recent post about the Berkman case.  Jim served as the presiding juror. He is properly proud of the hard work that he and his colleagues did on the case. He&#8217;s apparently been following the thread on this case, and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2008/07/another-berkmanarthur-andersen-juror-weighs-in/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
