<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Portland Oregon Personal Injury and Class Action Attorney – Lawyer – Paul and Sugerman PC &#187; L.A. Times</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pspc.com/category/la-times/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pspc.com</link>
	<description>David vs. Goliath view from Oregon trial lawyers at Paul &#38; Sugerman, PC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 03:16:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>LA Times editorial on U.S. Supreme Court tobacco case sails wide right</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2008/12/la-times-editorial-on-us-supreme-court-tobacco-case-sails-wide-right</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2008/12/la-times-editorial-on-us-supreme-court-tobacco-case-sails-wide-right#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 19:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[L.A. Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon injury attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[punitive damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philip Morris]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/?p=267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is a preplexing piece from the L.A. Times editorial page on the recent U.S. Supreme Court argument in Philip Morris v. Williams.  The Times editorial writers refer to the Oregon Supreme Court&#8217;s decision resting on &#8220;spurious state-law grounds.&#8221; Full disclosure: I represent amici in the case, so I am not impartial.
While they link to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2008/12/la-times-editorial-on-us-supreme-court-tobacco-case-sails-wide-right/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FDA preemption: Kleptocrats neglected to mention&#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2008/10/fda-preemption-kleptocrats-neglected-to-mention</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2008/10/fda-preemption-kleptocrats-neglected-to-mention#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bush administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[L.A. Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portland personal injury lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preemption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/?p=245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I grew up on Mad magazine, and one of my favorite features was &#8220;What they say&#8230;What they really mean.&#8221; And I&#8217;m reminded of that feature with this L.A. Times report on the Food and Drug Administration staff&#8217;s opposition to preemption.
Digression, first off, to credit reader JW on the pithy term &#8220;Kleptocracy&#8221; to describe the current [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2008/10/fda-preemption-kleptocrats-neglected-to-mention/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
