<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Portland Oregon Personal Injury and Class Action Attorney – Lawyer – Paul and Sugerman PC &#187; law geek alert</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pspc.com/category/law-geek-alert/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pspc.com</link>
	<description>David vs. Goliath view from Oregon trial lawyers at Paul &#38; Sugerman, PC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 03:16:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Providence medical record theft oral argument</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2009/03/providence-medical-record-theft-oral-argument</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2009/03/providence-medical-record-theft-oral-argument#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oregon Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon class action attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Providence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law geek alert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer medical records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data theft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/?p=294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those following Gibson v. Providence, State of Oregon Court of Appeals, Case No. CA A137930, we&#8217;re scheduled to argue in front of the Court of Appeals next Thursday, April 2. The question is whether the trial court erroneously dismissed the proposed class action.
It&#8217;s been a long haul, and there is far to go. No [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2009/03/providence-medical-record-theft-oral-argument/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ninth Circuit says no jurisdiction over eBay seller in buyer&#8217;s home state</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2008/09/ninth-circuit-says-no-jurisdiction-over-ebay-seller-in-buyers-home-state</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2008/09/ninth-circuit-says-no-jurisdiction-over-ebay-seller-in-buyers-home-state#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 15:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ninth Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon consumer lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eBay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law geek alert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/?p=222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ll try not to be too geeky here, but the Ninth Circuit issued an opinion recently in Boschetto v. Hansen , Case No. 06-16595 (Aug. 20, 2008) that tells us something about how our pre-www legal system handles rights and liabilities in this era of internet commerce.
The question: What happens in an Ebay auction goes [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2008/09/ninth-circuit-says-no-jurisdiction-over-ebay-seller-in-buyers-home-state/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
