<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Portland Oregon Personal Injury and Class Action Attorney – Lawyer – Paul and Sugerman PC &#187; medical records</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pspc.com/category/medical-records/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pspc.com</link>
	<description>David vs. Goliath view from Oregon trial lawyers at Paul &#38; Sugerman, PC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 03:16:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Oral argument in Providence medical record data theft case</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2009/04/oral-argument-in-providence-medical-record-data-theft-case</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2009/04/oral-argument-in-providence-medical-record-data-theft-case#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 16:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon class action attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Providence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/?p=306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those following the Providence Health System medical record data theft case, this is a summary of oral argument at the Oregon Court of Appeals last Friday. The three-judge panel, Judges Haselton, Armstrong, and Rosenblum were completely engaged and extremely well prepared.
There are several major legal issues. The first is whether Oregon law recognizes that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2009/04/oral-argument-in-providence-medical-record-data-theft-case/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Providence data theft brief on appeal</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2009/02/providence-data-theft-brief-on-appeal</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2009/02/providence-data-theft-brief-on-appeal#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oregon Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon consumer lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Providence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/?p=283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Catching up&#8211;because we are way behind&#8211;here&#8217;s the first of two overdue document updates. This link appellants-reply-brief-and-reply-excerpt-of-recort pulls up a copy of the patients&#8217; reply brief in the Oregon Court of Appeals in the proposed class action against Providence for loss of medical records.
Here&#8217;s a link to the entry that will pull up the patients&#8217; opening [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2009/02/providence-data-theft-brief-on-appeal/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update: Providence Data Loss Case</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2008/05/update-providence-data-loss-case</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2008/05/update-providence-data-loss-case#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 16:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Providence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preventable medical errors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Providence Data Loss]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/?p=159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in late 2005, a car prowler stole unencrypted computerized medical records of 365,000 Providence Health System patients from an employee&#8217;s car. We filed a case here in Portland on behalf of the 365,000 patients, and the trial judge granted Providence&#8217;s motion to dismiss the claim. We appealed and recently filed our opening brief with [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2008/05/update-providence-data-loss-case/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Mass Loss of Computerized Patient Records</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2008/03/another-mass-loss-of-computerized-patient-records</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2008/03/another-mass-loss-of-computerized-patient-records#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 21:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Providence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data loss]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/2008/03/another-mass-loss-of-computerized-patient-records</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This sounds familiar. In today&#8217;s news, a laptop stolen from the National Institute of Health contained unencrypted medical records on 2,500 patients.  By way of full disclosure, I represent Portland-area patients in a case against the Providence medical system for a similar data loss.
I can&#8217;t help but be amazed that any medical information is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2008/03/another-mass-loss-of-computerized-patient-records/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
