<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Portland Oregon Personal Injury and Class Action Attorney – Lawyer – Paul and Sugerman PC &#187; MSNBC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pspc.com/category/msnbc/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pspc.com</link>
	<description>David vs. Goliath view from Oregon trial lawyers at Paul &#38; Sugerman, PC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 03:16:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Billing patients for avoidable medical errors</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2008/08/billing-patients-for-avoidable-medical-errors</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2008/08/billing-patients-for-avoidable-medical-errors#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 23:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portland injury lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical negligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preventable medical errors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[billing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hospitals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical errors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/?p=212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The medical profession has taken to calling them &#8220;never errors,&#8221; a label for errors&#8211;like surgery on the wrong leg or administering the wrong dose of medicine&#8211;that never should happen.  Unfortunately, these &#8220;never errors&#8221; are not new. Worse, they sometimes occur in clusters, like this one involving the family of actor Randy Quaid.  The good news [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2008/08/billing-patients-for-avoidable-medical-errors/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal judge rejects Bush aids&#8217; claims of immunity</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2008/07/federal-judge-rejects-bush-aids-claims-of-immunity</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2008/07/federal-judge-rejects-bush-aids-claims-of-immunity#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bush administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contempt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subpoena]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/?p=203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sounds like it&#8217;s a long opinion&#8211;93(!) pages&#8211;but it looks like the Bush administration suffered a serious smack down in federal district court. Here&#8217;s the media report on the court&#8217;s ruling that President Bush&#8217;s aids must in fact honor Congressional subpoenas and appear and testify in response.
The district court&#8217;s ruling by Judge John Bates is a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2008/07/federal-judge-rejects-bush-aids-claims-of-immunity/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Greed and fraud run amok in deregulated markets</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2008/06/greed-and-fraud-run-amok-in-deregulated-markets</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2008/06/greed-and-fraud-run-amok-in-deregulated-markets#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 23:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bear Stearns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon class action lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon consumer lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Oregonian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investor fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deregulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage lending indictments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon consumer attorney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/?p=187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two stories in today&#8217;s news provide court-side glimpses of two forms of market abuse that led us skipping down the garden path to the cratered economy. In this one from the Oregonian you can learn all about the alleged scams by various Oregon flimflam men who saw that the trough was unguarded. They apparently goosed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2008/06/greed-and-fraud-run-amok-in-deregulated-markets/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nursing home arbitration clauses stripping away accountability</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2008/06/nursing-home-arbitration-clauses-stripping-away-accountability</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2008/06/nursing-home-arbitration-clauses-stripping-away-accountability#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portland personal injury lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arbitration clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nursing home litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mandatory arbitration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/?p=186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a half-decent summary of how mandatory arbitration clauses strip away patients and families&#8217; ability to hold bad nursing homes accountable for abusive care. It&#8217;s only half right, though, as the writer misses the most significant problem with mandatory arbitration clauses.
Too often, they come with rules that make pursuit of any claim impossible. As well, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2008/06/nursing-home-arbitration-clauses-stripping-away-accountability/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bank collusion case goes forward: the you-got-no-choice-on-arbitration case</title>
		<link>http://www.pspc.com/2008/04/bank-collusion-case-goes-forward-the-you-got-no-choice-on-arbitration-case</link>
		<comments>http://www.pspc.com/2008/04/bank-collusion-case-goes-forward-the-you-got-no-choice-on-arbitration-case#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 18:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon class action lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arbitration clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mandatory arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red tapes chronicle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pspc.com/?p=142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kudos to MSNBC&#8217;s Red Tape Chronicles for reporting again on a quiet but important consumer issue.  As the good people at Public Justice explain, the U.S. Court of Appeals reversed a federal court&#8217;s dismissal of a claim brought against a who&#8217;s who of credit card companies, claiming that they colluded to require subscribers to take [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pspc.com/2008/04/bank-collusion-case-goes-forward-the-you-got-no-choice-on-arbitration-case/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
